THEBLOG4.ME

How to write a journal article review paper

  • 21.06.2019

We are always here to help you with your assignments when you are tied-up with something else. KingEssays reviews: 4. If you want to learn how to critique an article, you should first have a clear understanding of what this assignment is about. Generally, it is an objective analysis of any piece of work not depending on its genre , which includes your personal thoughts on the subject.

To help identify essential gaps in research to find solutions. They are used in current debates for references They are good for generating ideas about next field of research They also help the learner to become an expert in a particular area of study.

How to write a good article review? For an excellent article review, one should first prepare then write the review. Preparation includes the following steps: Step 1: Understanding what the article review is. You should be aware that the audience of the review has knowledge on the subject matter and is not just a general audience. You need to summarize the main ideas of the article, arguments, positions, and findings. Also, critique the contributions of the material and overall effectiveness of the field.

Note that, The review only responds to the research of the author and does not involve new research. It evaluates and summarizes the article. Step 2: Identify the organization of the review. You need to know the setup of your article review to understand how to read the article. Following these steps will help you in writing a useful review: Summarize the article.

This may be appropriate but only if authors report on how the image has been edited e. Where you feel that an image has been edited or manipulated without explanation, you should highlight this in a confidential comment to the editor in your report.

List of References You will need to check referencing for accuracy, adequacy and balance. Accuracy Where a cited article is central to the author's argument, you should check the accuracy and format of the reference - and bear in mind different subject areas may use citations differently.

Adequacy You should consider if the referencing is adequate: Are important parts of the argument poorly supported? Are there published studies that show similar or dissimilar trends that should be discussed? If a manuscript only uses half the citations typical in its field, this may be an indicator that referencing should be improved - but don't be guided solely by quantity References should be relevant, recent and readily retrievable Balance Check for a well-balanced list of references that is: Helpful to the reader Fair to competing authors Not over-reliant on self-citation Gives due recognition to the initial discoveries and related work that led to the work under assessment You should be able to evaluate whether the article meets the criteria for balanced referencing without looking up every reference.

Plagiarism By now you will have a deep understanding of the paper's content - and you may have some concerns about plagiarism. Identified Concern If you find - or already knew of - a very similar paper, this may be because the author overlooked it in their own literature search. Or it may be because it is very recent or published in a journal slightly outside their usual field.

You may feel you can advise the author how to emphasize the novel aspects of their own study, so as to better differentiate it from similar research. If so, you may ask the author to discuss their aims and results, or modify their conclusions, in light of the similar article. Of course, the research similarities may be so great that they render the work unoriginal and you have no choice but to recommend rejection.

Most editors have access to software that can check for plagiarism. Editors are not out to police every paper, but when plagiarism is discovered during peer review it can be properly addressed ahead of publication. If plagiarism is discovered only after publication, the consequences are worse for both authors and readers, because a retraction may be necessary.

Search Engine Optimization SEO After the detailed read-through, you will be in a position to advise whether the title, abstract and key words are optimized for search purposes. In order to be effective, good SEO terms will reflect the aims of the research. A clear title and abstract will improve the paper's search engine rankings and will influence whether the user finds and then decides to navigate to the main article.

The title should contain the relevant SEO terms early on. This has a major effect on the impact of a paper, since it helps it appear in search results. A poor abstract can then lose the reader's interest and undo the benefit of an effective title - whilst the paper's abstract may appear in search results, the potential reader may go no further. So ask yourself, while the abstract may have seemed adequate during earlier checks, does it: Do justice to the manuscript in this context?

Highlight important findings sufficiently? Present the most interesting data? Editors say, "Does the Abstract highlight the important findings of the study?

Point out the similarities the article shares with what you have read on the topic before, as well as the differences. If you come across a section that you do not fully understand, you should not leave it like this. You can only write a solid article review if you have made sure that you understand everything there is to understand in and about the article.

Step 5. Retell the article to yourself It is best to do it in written form, such as an outline or a piece of free writing. Basically, you just put the information you have just read in your own words. This should include the author's claim, the conducted research, and the argument s. You need to be careful and accurate not to miss any important details. This text is only for your use, so it does not need any editing or proofreading, but it needs to be clear so that you could return to it at any time and not spend time remembering what exactly you meant by this or that.

If you choose to write an outline, it is better not to include your opinions here. Instead, you should better stick to the main points of the article.

Having retold the gist of the article, take your time and decide which parts are worth discussing in the review. While you always have to discuss the main issues, it is also worth to concentrate certain aspects such as the content, the interpretation of facts, the theoretical basis, the style of narration, etc.

Sometimes, your tutor will specify on what you should focus. Re-read your summary to cross out the items that can be omitted. This can be repeated information or something not critical to your cause. Step 6. Outline your review Look at your summary to see if the author was clear about each of them.

Then put together the lists of strong points and drawbacks and summarize them. For example, a strong point may be the introduction of new information, and a drawback may be the lack of accuracy in representing the existing knowledge on the topic. Add these outcomes to your study and back them up with evidence from the text of the article.

Answering these questions should facilitate your outline writing: What was the goal of the article? What theories does the author dwell upon? Is the author clear with definitions? Is the supportive evidence relevant? What is the place of the article in its field of knowledge?

  • Wife of bath prologue essay help;
  • Pen writing on paper animation videos;
  • Branding af denmark essay writer;
Summarizes recent research related to the topic Highlights gaps in current understanding or conflicts in current knowledge Establishes the originality of the research aims by demonstrating the need for investigations in the topic area Gives price clear idea orleanna the target readership, why the research was carried out and the novelty and topicality of the manuscript Originality and Topicality Originality and topicality can only be established in the light of recent authoritative research. For example, it's impossible to argue that there is a conflict in help understanding by referencing articles that are 10 years old. Authors may essay the case that a topic hasn't been investigated in several years and that new research is required. This point is only valid cheap paper writing site au researchers can point to recent developments in data gathering techniques or to research in indirectly related fields that suggest the topic needs revisiting. Clearly, authors can only do this by referencing recent literature.

Article Critique Example

Introduction: Write the topic of the study, which serves as the identification sentence. The article review outline usually goes like this: Summary of the article. Present the most interesting data? However, main argument is an essential part of your work and you need to include it at the beginning of your paper to make sure everyone knows what your position on the subject is.
  • Write a thesis statement for a research paper;
  • 10 page research paper writing;
  • Writing conclusions for compare and contrast essays format;
  • Best cover letter writers nyc;

Overview of the Review Report Format

Outline your review Look at your summary to see if the author was clear about each of them. Many students forget about this important element and simply try to summarize the whole article. Where information is clear, you should check that: The results seem plausible, in case there is an error in data gathering The trends you can see support the paper's discussion and conclusions There are sufficient data. Authors are more likely to read your review if you do so. Are the correct references cited? Search Engine Optimization SEO After the detailed read-through, you will be in a position to advise whether the title, abstract and key words are optimized for search purposes. Check with your summary and describe how well the topic is covered in the article. Is the supportive evidence relevant? The title should contain the relevant SEO terms early on.

Article review format – how to apply it correctly

We are always here to help you with your assignments when you are tied-up with something else. KingEssays reviews: 4. If you want to learn how to critique an article, you should first have a clear understanding of what this assignment is about.
Use the formal style and narrate impersonally or from the third person, avoid the first person. Read the article entirely. The most meaningful parts here are the main points and the facts to support them. Remember that each bit of your opinion that you introduce should be backed up by indisputable evidence.

What is an article review?

Order Now An article review is essential because: Niklas plaetzer essay writing corrects vague terms. In writing of your article, there may be instances of usage of inappropriate words or unclear statements. It helps the writer to decide on whether to change the terms.
How to write a journal article review paper
To summarize the article properly, one needs to comprehend the essence of the work, its argument, and its main points. Remember to stick to the point and make sure that there is no unrelated information. Look at the title of the article, abstract, introduction, headings, opening sentences of paragraphs and conclusion. You need to know the setup of your article review to understand how to read the article.

The First Read-Through

As you analyze the article, you use your own ideas and research experience. If so, you may ask the author to discuss their aims and results, or modify their conclusions, in light of the similar article. This can be repeated information or something not critical to your cause. Is the evidence they present strong enough to prove their case? Hence, article review writing process consists of two stages: preparation and writing. Read the introduction, the conclusion, the first sentences of each paragraph. List of References You will need to check referencing for accuracy, adequacy and balance. It includes a summary of the review question, the primary study reviewed and conclusions of the study.

The goal of journal article reviews is to get the students familiar with the works of the renowned article in a particular field. To summarize the article properly, one does listening to music help writing a paper to comprehend the review of the work, its argument, and its main write. You are expected paper assess the main theme, its supporting arguments, and the perspectives for further research in the given direction. Like any other how piece, an article review requires thorough preparation.
How to write a journal article review paper
This will often comprise a range of questions followed by comment sections. Step 4. In particular, bear in mind that some journals will not want the recommendation included in any comments to authors, as this can cause editors difficulty later - see Section 11 for more advice about working with editors. Remember that each bit of your opinion that you introduce should be backed up by indisputable evidence.

Write the main body of your review This is the core of the review. Also, they won't get feedback on how to improve their research and it could trigger an appeal Remember to give constructive criticism even if recommending rejection. Are citations excessive, limited, or biased? You can also make a suggestion as to the direction for further research on the topic. It includes a summary of the review question, the primary study reviewed and conclusions of the study.
  • Reflective essay on writing 101 text;
  • Guide to writing college application essays;
  • How to write a diary entry essay examples;
  • Essay writing service singapore news;
  • Share

Feedback

Kagagul

Materials and Methods Academic research should be replicable, repeatable and robust - and follow best practice. Clearly outline the order in which every sub-topic will be discussed to give the reader background information needed to understand the sections in the article.

Shakataxe

Reviewers should check the preferences of individual journals as to where they want review decisions to be stated. Summarizes recent research related to the topic Highlights gaps in current understanding or conflicts in current knowledge Establishes the originality of the research aims by demonstrating the need for investigations in the topic area Gives a clear idea of the target readership, why the research was carried out and the novelty and topicality of the manuscript Originality and Topicality Originality and topicality can only be established in the light of recent authoritative research. Pass your judgment as to whether the given facts are sufficient for supporting the author's main argument. So be polite, honest and clear.

Mejind

Make sure that you use specific references and examples.

Tujora

Step 2: Identify the organization of the review. A poor abstract can then lose the reader's interest and undo the benefit of an effective title - whilst the paper's abstract may appear in search results, the potential reader may go no further.

Duzahn

The title should contain the relevant SEO terms early on.

Faugal

If you follow all the recommendations, you will easily complete an outstanding article critique without any efforts!

LEAVE A COMMENT