It would be a wanton cruelty. The death penalty takes focus away from the victims and focuses the attention on the criminal. These are just some of the reasons the death penalty should be removed. There are of course many more. This is the thought 7, people have experienced in the last 18 months. In modern day America we are still faced with the antiquated ritual of capital punishment, a practice that interferes directly with the law of the land.
The same forms of punishment used during the middle ages are still in effect today, the same ideas that should have been abolished had the U. Capital punishment is cruel as well as unusual and inadequate for our advanced society. Thesis two: Concretely and in practice, compelling arguments against capital punishment can be made on the basis of its actual administration in our society. To negate death first of all would mean the moratorium on wars that take lives of more people than death penalty.
The war casualties are often innocent peaceful people who just happened to be caught in the cross-fire, unlike recidivist criminals who end up on death row. Yet most Christian states prepare military doctrines and demonstrate to each other readiness to employ their military machine to kill people if necessary.
Still others are practicing war if it suits their political goals. How significantly will then abolition of death penalty forward the goal of living a Christian life?
The same argument applies to the anti-death penalty claim that the legal system should not be allowed to execute because there is a possibility of a legal mistake that will result in the death of a wrong person NCWC. On these grounds, wars have to be forbidden in the first place since they keep killing people that are not to blame at all.
They either do their best fighting for their motherland in expectation of a heroic death or just, as mentioned before, get caught in cross-fire. Thus, any nation that does not exclude a war should not exclude death penalty that is a much more balanced mechanism. Besides, the legal system is unfortunately prone to mistakes, as are all social institutions, but this does not mean that they should not be used to carry out their functions.
Most other penalties like imprisonment take a heavy toll on human life, yet they are applied to criminals, even if there is a threat of ruining a person's life by mistake. Besides, returning to the incident in Alabama in the previous section, a person dying at the hands of an acknowledged murderer in prison is also a fatal mistake of the legal system.
If the system rightfully recognized the capacity to continue killing in the criminal, his final victim would have saved his life. First, it is still preserved in many nations including the US that fits into many criteria of a civilized country. Besides, quite a few nations that have it in their penal codes like Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Pakistan, Barbado, Bangladesh enjoy a relatively low crime rate.
This underscores that death penalty adequately serves the main purpose of the legal system: to protect law-abiding citizens. Conclusion There are many more issues that can be considered with regard to death penalty. One can evaluate the racist argument, for instance, claiming that death penalty is more often imposed on Afro-Americans than European Americans and see how it relates to crime rate in the two groups.
Besides, ethical perspectives on this issue can be diverse and supported by many different theories. With the arguments presented above, however, it seems clear that there are many valid reasons in support of death penalty. On the contrary, anti-death penalty arguments need to be assessed critically, as, for instance, the religious argument. Further research into the topic is necessary, with more authoritative studies on the deterrent effect of death penalty on the criminal rates, tracing various states in the US as well as evidence from other nations.
It would also be interesting to examine the historical background of nations that have both capital punishment in their law codes and extremely low crime rate to see how death penalty affects crime rates. On the more practical level, it is my deepest belief that currently capital punishment has to be preserved in order to protect potential victims. Any consideration of the crime rate cancellation would become viable if the crime rate at least for murders goes sharply down. At present, however, capital punishment serves as an important barrier on the way of criminals ready to take another person's life.
Due to the extra measures taken in judicial proceedings, lawyer fees, extended trials, and expert witnesses, costs end up being higher. One was sentenced to death. It is a total waste of effort,time and money to kill someone. This money should have been donated or spend to someone who deserves it rather than to a criminal whom can be punish by a life sentence without a parole.
And the last reason,it puts innocent lives at risk. Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in , innocent men and women have been released from death row, including some who came within minutes of execution. Many of these cases were discovered not because of the normal appeals process, but rather as a result of new scientific techniques, investigations by journalists, and the dedicated work of expert attorneys. In Missouri, Texas and Virginia investigations have been opened to determine if those states executed innocent men.
To execute an innocent person is morally reprehensible; this is a risk we cannot take. Some severe methods look even worse, most of people may ever watched some movie scenes of old executive methods, like hanging, burning alive.
And now we have firing squad and electric chair. I believe only persuade people by changing laws and educating them can promote the development of the society and bring people security. Indeed,death penalty cases are much more expensive than other criminal cases and cost more than imprisonment for life. Pre-trial motions, expert witness investigations, jury selection, and the necessity for two trials — one on guilt and one on sentencing — make capital cases extremely costly, even before the appeals process begins.
Crime rates have been increasing rapidly,wars have overtaken the earth11 and thus humanity is slowly disappearing in front of our own eyes. They are getting more economic benefits that anti-social elements and can enjoy a more secure future. Awarding capital punishment is a cruel way to punish someone and it goes against the rights guaranteed by the US Constitution. There is no place for it in a modern society that is based on ethics and values.
In most nations, death penalty is used to punish criminals for war crimes or serious crimes associated with physical injury. The Relevance of Life-Life Tradeoffs. Besides, the legal system is unfortunately prone to mistakes, as are all social institutions, but this does not mean that they should not be used to carry out their functions. The death penalty puts the scales of justice back in balance after they were unfairly tipped towards the criminal. August
American society seems to favor retribution. Capital punishment was abolished from the Canadian Criminal Code in
When a man is accused of throwing a child a high-rise terrace, my emotional response is that he should be given an opportunity to see how endless the seconds are from the 31st floor to the ground. This resulted in a wide discrepancy of laws on this issue. This extreme retribution is reserved for those who have committed heinous, or capital crimes against society, therefore considered an ongoing threat.
Capital punishment also acts as a deterrent for recidivism the rate at which previously convicted criminals return to committing crimes after being released ; if the criminal is executed he has no opportunity to commit crimes again. The United State has struggled to justify capital punishment with 18 states abolishing the practice and almost all states having a history of abolishment.